In December of last year, I painted a cover for Art Review magazine’s annual Power 100 list focusing on the role major international exhibitions played in shaping the list. It seemed heavy on the artists, curators, directors, and funders involved in the big surveys that operate in relation to the art market’s global sprawl of art fairs.
It was interesting to read Art Review’s coverage of the 2026 Biennial curated artist list, which included a brief curatorial statement, ‘‘The 61st international art exhibition of La Biennale di Venezia intends neither a litany of commentary on world events, nor an inattention or escape from compounding and continuous intersecting crises,’’ said Rory Tsapayi. ‘‘Rather, it proposes a radical reconnection with art’s natural habitat and role in society, that is the emotional, the visual, the sensory, the effective, the subjective’’.
While I don’t imagine that Tsapayi is responding in any way to my cover or series of drawings that explored the kinds of power represented on the list, I enjoyed reading their aspirational definition of “art’s natural habit and role in society.” While the giant Biennial tent in my painting is indeed situated in nature, it is set far away from any particular society to reflect to the cultivated distance contemporary art maintains from any of the societies the artists and art works represent. This distance, or disinterest, extends to the conflicts taking place in the distance from war to immigration detention centers to the growing impacts of global climate change.
I appreciate the nuance in Tsapayi’s statement, which suggests that art once held a role in society, and that a “radical reconnection” is now required. In the painting, a collapsed bridge waits to be re-built, to perhaps reconnect art to the communities and people who live the countries that temporarily host this migratory art world offering the challenges and pleasures of “_the emotional, the visual, the sensory, the effective, the subjective.” _I don’t expect that one edition of La Biennale di Venezia will rebuild the bridge between contemporary art and the societies it emerges from, but I certainly appreciate how Tsapayi and their co-curators are aware of the distance between art and society. If I have the leisure time and money this year, I would like to visit Italy and explore the 61st edition, but that points to another classed definition of society.
For more about the cover and my drawings for the issue, please read my interview with Art Review editor Oliver Basciano.




















